Moving To Work Program San Mateo County, Stihl Chainsaw Bogs Down When I Give It Gas, Big Whiskey's Nutrition Information, How To Make A Leo Woman Obsessed With You, Finesse Nails Westport, Ct, Articles U

That number includes both private sector and state and local . Lara G. v Postmaster General, EEOC Req. 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171406.pdf. 2 The present-day value of comparable cases is to be considered when determining an award of emotional distress damages. 2020001024 (June 14, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020001024.pdf. 0120181844 (Sept. 10, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120181844.pdf. 0720170019 (Aug. 3, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720170019.txt. The Commission has jurisdiction over complaints alleging discrimination occurring in the course of a dual-status technician's civilian employment in a General Services position. International Committee of the Fourth International. Margeret M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. After an appeal, complainant later requested the EEOC reopen her case. Harlan P. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 0120170676 (Oct. 31, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170676.pdf. Lara G. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. Carroll R. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. You benefit from having control of the process, since you authorize access to your information. Ruben T. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Upon your death, all of your assets will pass along, either under the terms of a will or (if you have no will) pursuant to what the law prescribes. Antony Z. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Request No. 2020002713 (June 16, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_19/2020002713.pdf. The AJ took account of several factors that limited Complainants non-pecuniary damages award, found that the Agency was not the sole cause of Complainants emotional and psychological harm, and limited the award of pecuniary damages to the amounts contained in "legitimate receipts.". 22, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2020001154.pdf. Supervisor engaged in per se reprisal when he told Complainant that her complaints about EEO issues were causing him extra work and stress, threatened her with termination, and labeled her as someone who does not work well with others because of her oral complaints about co-workers. Can I be reinstated to my USPS job now while this relief process is ongoing? Alline B. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 12, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2019005682.pdf. Agency's final order adopting Administrative Judge's decision vacated, and case remanded to Agency for reissuance of final order, where Complainant did not receive the AJ's decision and therefore was unable to argue with specificity about the AJ's findings and conclusions that the Agency implemented. Removing Complainant from the workplace by placing her on administrative leave did not insulate the Agency from liability for sexual harassment; reassigning the person targeted for harassment is not appropriate corrective action. The reduction in attorney fees indicates the importance of a timely submitted detailed fee petition for attorney fees and expenses, including a printout of the time and costs incurred, the services rendered, and a sworn affidavit setting forth justification for the attorneys requested hourly rate(s), fees and costs. Postmaster engaged in an impermissible disability-related inquiry when the Postmaster asked Complainant in front of a customer if she was dyslexic. The Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of disability (perceived color perception deficiency) when it rescinded a tentative offer of employment for a motor vehicle operator position; the Agency did not perform an individualized assessment of whether Complainant could perform the essential functions of the position without posing a direct threat to himself or others. 2019002318 (Apr. Agency, which provided no explanation for the more-than-one-year delay in its issuance of the final decision, was ordered to post a notice at its Complaint Adjudication Office regarding its failure to comply with the Commission's regulatory timeframes and orders and to provide training to its EEO personnel. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. Agency's final decisions on disputed claims for individual relief were premature because an Administrative Judge retains jurisdiction and is responsible for resolving disputed claims for individual relief. 2019004326 (Sept. 30, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019004326.pdf. No. 0120162314 (June 5, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162314.txt. The EEOC ordered the Postal Service to notify each class member, within 10 calendar days, of the EEOC decision. Margaret M. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Jennifer K. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. The complainant worked at the United States Postal Service (USPS). Agency discriminatorily denied Complainant's religious-accommodation request for an exemption from the requirement that employees carry a cannister of pepper spray where it was undisputed that Complainant, a chaplain, had a bona fide religious belief that prevented him from carrying the spray; Agency did not show that exempting one employee, out of approximately 300 employees, from the requirement would have been an undue hardship; and there was no evidence that Agency explored a lateral transfer to a different facility or any other alternative accommodation. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. 0720160021 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720160021.txt. Complainant did not establish an Equal Pay Act violation where he and his female comparator performed substantially different jobs in two different locations, they were supervised under different management chains, the female comparator used more complex technology, and she had been paid at a higher level prior to receiving a lateral transfer. Pamula W. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Agency denied Complainant a reasonable accommodation for his hearing disability when it did not provide a sign language interpreter during training and safety meetings; where the physical safety of employees in the workplace is the subject of discussion, it is uniquely pressing for Complainant to have access to the information being conveyed. She further alleged the USPS retaliated against her for prior EEO action from 2005-2006. A lock ( 0120170064 (Feb. 8, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170064.pdf. The Cost to your Company. 0120180736 (Aug. 30. I really wish there was a law forbidding Union Money being spent on political candidates running for public office. Sharon M. v. Dep't of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. A lock ( She alleged the USPS had not complied with the EEOC order. Heidi B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. on 8/11/2022 Joint Employers in Permian Basin Retaliated. Although Petitioner was entitled to back pay as a component of make-whole relief, she was not entitled to a sum greater than what she would have earned but for her constructive discharge; because her earnings while in active-duty military service between the time of her constructive discharge and her reinstatement exceeded her gross civilian back pay, Petitioner was not entitled to receive back pay. Salvatore K. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120162491 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162491.pdf. 0120172637 (Mar. To help the public identify those decisions, the Commission has decided to assign randomly generated first names and initials, along with a brief summary of the decisions, to the cases. 25, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170498.pdf. 0720150002 (Sept. 25, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720150002.txt. The complainants own testimony, along with the circumstances of a particular case, can suffice to sustain his burden in this regard. usps eeoc settlements 2020. boca beacon obituaries. 8403 Colesville RoadSuite 1000Silver Spring, MD 20910, 610 South Ninth StreetLas Vegas, NV 89101, 2023 Gilbert Employment Law, P.C. 529 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1FB7EE72CCD9854B90DCFC8A33497EB8><1B534663FC186A42AEFC8BA0152CE4CF>]/Index[511 26]/Info 510 0 R/Length 94/Prev 400457/Root 512 0 R/Size 537/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Lacy R. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 2020000109 (Oct. 26, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020000109.pdf. An official website of the United States government. When the Merit Systems Protection Board dismisses a case for lack of jurisdiction, the matter is no longer a mixed case and should be remanded to the agency for further processing as a non-mixed complaint. Agency properly dismissed complaint as untimely filed where Agency notified Complainant of applicable filing deadline and proper address to file her complaint with the Agency but Complainant nonetheless sent the complaint to the EEOC's Office of Federal Operations. Generally, to win a retaliation case, you have to show (1) legally protected activity -- of which Ryan had tons, (2) adverse employment action -- and getting fired is clearly "adverse," so Ryan had that, too, and (3) a "causal connection" between the legally protected activity and the adverse employment action (uh-oh). 131 M Street, NE 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_04_05/2019005824%20DEC.pdf. This means a settlement from the EEOC or business is not accepted and the victim decides to take the matter to court. The Agency subjected Complainant to adverse treatment based on protected EEO activity when the office director informed Complainant's detail supervisor that Complainant was engaged in settlement discussions for an EEO complaint. (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) On December 1, 2020, Arbitrator Sharnoff issued a decision confirming Clerk Craft jurisdiction over operation of the Small Parcel Sorting System. We notified the Judge about this, and argued that this is yet another reason to move this process toward a quick resolution. In 2021, we reported that non-career employees' turnover and injury rates were higher than career rates, both before and after we controlled for numerous factors such as employee tenure. Darin B. v. Office of Personnel Management, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC concluded that the employee demonstrated that the Postal Service reasons for its actions were more than likely a pretext for reprisal discrimination and that the award of $40,000 was consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases. In reversing the agencys final decision, the EEOC held that evidence from a health-care provider or other expert is not a mandatory prerequisite for recovery of compensatory damages for emotional harm. It went to state that: Objective evidence of compensatory damages can include statements from the Complainant concerning his emotional pain or suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, injury to professional standing, injury to character or reputation, injury to credit standing, loss of health and any other non-pecuniary losses that are incurred as a result of the discriminatory conduct. March 1, 2023 12:32 pm. Alesia P. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120161608 (July 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161608.txt. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offers three ways to voluntarily resolve charges: mediation, settlement and conciliation. Our goal is to get this matter resolved in a fair way as quickly as possible. She alleged that the USPS has subjected her to disability discrimination and harassment. 0120181502 (Sept. 17, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120181502.pdf. The participation rate for FY 2008 was 0.77% and for FY 2005 was 0.88%. During the coming weeks, we will not only be analyzing the spreadsheet for the Agency's compliance with the Judge's Order, but we will also be supplementing the spreadsheet with the information the EEOC has asked us to compile. The Administrative Judge properly reduced Complainant's attorney's fees and costs by 40 percent where Complainant prevailed on only one of his five retaliation claims, the successful claim was not so inextricably intertwined with the unsuccessful claims that Complainant would be entitled to an award of full attorney's fees, the case did not present novel issues, and the fee petition contained numerous instances that might be considered excessive, duplicative, or unreasonable time expended. The grievances expressed in the lawsuit are the result of the subordination of the US Postal Service to the relentless demands of the capitalist profit system in which it operates, and these conditions cannot be eliminated for all workers through the capitalist legal system. [9] These numbers reflect an increase in the percentage of Title VII settlements compared to 2016-2019. Malinda F. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. Agency discriminated against Complainant based on disability when it denied her request for leave without pay and charged her with being absent without leave; agencies may need to modify general leave policies when providing reasonable accommodations. Keri C. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Zonia C. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Republican President Donald Trump has unleashed new threats to privatize the USPS in recent years, against which thousands of postal workers in cities across the US protested in 2018. USPS asks that the EEOC simply take their word that all Class Members were properly notified . Although Complainant prevailed on only two of his thirteen claims, his hostile work environment claim was not fractionable from his successful claims because they arose out of a common core of facts which took place during his approximately nine months of employment. USPS workers have had their jobs and living standards under attack since the 1970s as a massive shift of wealth from the working class to the corporate ruling class was underway. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 20, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170604.pdf. 131 M Street, NE 1614.108(f) giving the individual the right to elect between a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge and an immediate final decision. Alena C. v. Dep't of State, EEOC Appeal No. Celine B. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC in making its award of $165,000 in compensatory damages noted that Padilla had asserted that he had both emotional and physical suffering since his termination, lost custody of his daughter, hasnt been able to see his daughter since his former wife and daughter relocated, lost friendships, has slept in his car and frequently didnt have any food. 6, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161068.txt. Mac O. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Sheila D. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Petition No. 0520130618 (June 9, 2017) citing thEEOC V. AIC Security Investigations, Inc. 55 F.3d 1276 at 1286 (7 Cir. If you have questions contact the EEOC at: 131 M Street, NE Workers allege that they were let go from their new positions when the USPS told them that there was not enough work in the new positions to keep the workers employed. "A$~ XD,R=T0Y& IkN =@&F>_ {. death spawn osrs. Joshua F. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 5, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/0120180519.pdf. Thus the Commission limited its award of attorney fees to $1,000 based on an hourly rate of $250 per hour rather than the requested amount of $5,094.73. Brenton W. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed. USPS' average time for completing an investigation was 113 days. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Office of Federal Operations (OFO) is issuing the following instructions regarding the processing of federal sector EEO complaints covered by 29 CFR Part 1614. The Judge has not yet made clear exactly how she plans to move forward with reviewing the information or issuing relief decisions. Published Sept. 27, 2021 Updated Oct. 28, 2021. May 4, 2020 An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. LockA locked padlock In July 2011, under Democratic President Barack Obama, the USPS announced plans to close 3,700 post offices across the US. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Brendon L. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120161017 (May 29, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161017.txt. Copyright 2023 The Angel Law Firm, PLLC. EEOC resolved 70,804 charges in FY 2020 and increased its merit factor resolution rate to 17.4 percent from 15.6 percent the prior year. The four unions which officially represent the postal workersthe American Postal Workers Union, National Association of Letter Carriers, National Postal Mail Handlers Union and National Rural Letter Carriers Associationhave not lifted a finger to mobilize workers to oppose these attacks, including the loss of over 250,000 post office jobs since 1999an almost 28 percent reduction in its workforce. Postal Service warns vaccine rules could affect deliveries, OSHA Vaccine Rule Applies to USPS Employees. Complainant stated a viable claim of harassment based on race and national origin where Complainant alleged that subordinate disparaged Chinese immigrants, mocked Complainant's language and communication skills, insinuated that Complainant was un-American, and interfered with work performance. The manager informed the 9-1-1 dispatchers that Mr. Purviance was a disgruntled worker and that they suspected him of filing a . Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 100 days. If such draconian moves ever go forward, it will only be thanks to the previous Democratic and Republican administrations which sanctioned cuts to the USPS and to the postal workers unions which have been complicit in these attacks. We hope to have some good progress on final awards during 2021, and we will continue to post updates on this website. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination allegations. 2020005108 (Apr. 0120180137 (Apr. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that Complainant, who held a GS-14 position, did not establish that her work was substantially equal to that of GS-15 male employees; Complainant did not have the same responsibilities as her comparators because she was not a supervisor, did not have budget authority, did not speak for the Agency the way higher-level employees did, and did not have the technical expertise of higher-level employees. Postal Service Love Series Celebrates the Beauty and Delight of Flowers, USPS to end Priority Mail Prepaid Flat Rate Stamped Envelopes, USPS: Cyber Monday Is Next WeekFour Weeks Left for Holiday Shopping and Shipping, Michigan NALC Branch President Pleads Guilty to Embezzlement of $6,600, Postal Regulatory Commission Vice Chair Temporarily Assumes Administrative Responsibilities of the Agency, Biden to nominate 2 for USPS Board of Governors, oust DeJoy allies Bloom, Barger, New Orleans Letter Carrier Indicted for Delay or Destruction of Mail, U.S. The Commission had previously found discrimination in EEOC Appeal No. Summary judgment in favor of Agency inappropriate where AJ abused her discretion in denying Complainant's Motion to Compel and there were genuine issues of material fact concerning whether Agency had a policy or practice of not accommodating pregnant workers while accommodating other categories of workers. Fiona H. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone), Call 1-800-669-4000 The Postal Service has a comprehensive workplace violence program to identify, review, report, and address employee assaults nationwide. 0 Agency did not take prompt corrective action, and therefore did not meet its affirmative defense to harassment, when it took six months to engage in an internal investigation and issue a proposed 30-day suspension to the coworker who had sent Complainant a threatening email containing a racial slur. As part of the federal-sector investigative process, an investigator must obtain information about vacancies from an agency and should give a complainant the opportunity to explain whether she or he can perform the essential functions of the vacant positions with or without reasonable accommodation. 0120170498 (Apr. 2019002953 (Jan. 27, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/2019002953.pdf. 4~I1i.#3S*S6SS2+V18gtdm$0^FA !HS4$0I@T1 6 Alonzo N. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC has tremendous flexibility when deciding whether to sue an employer or accept an employer's offer to settle. Washington DC 20005. For complaint closures with monetary benefits, the averageawardwas$9,418. Last year, when the city of Minneapolis awarded $27 million to the family of George Floyd, their attorney called it the largest pretrial civil rights settlement ever. 2019003663 (Aug. 22, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019003663.pdf. Complainant entitled to attorney's fees where relief awarded was based on per se reprisal claims that the Administrative Judge sua sponte raised mid-way through the hearing process; attorney's competent representation of Complainant and development of the evidence led directly to the AJ's sua sponte raising of reprisal as a basis. Due to the increasing use of email and the internet for correspondence and document delivery, the volume of first-class mail processed by the USPS declined by 43 percent in 2017 from its peak in 2001. The NRP was utilized by the USPS from 20062011. Leora R. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC recognizes this crisis affects all federal employees, complainants, and others involved in the EEO process. Velva B. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal Nos. Including the NRP case, the USPS estimates that it may owe up to $178 million in potential liabilities for pending employment claims. Substantial evidence supported the Administrative Judge's determination that the Agency retaliated against Complainant for protected EEO activity when it issued her a Letter of Counseling. Where Agency failed to provide evidence of its compliance with Commission's orders, and its refusal to report on its compliance appeared to be part of an ongoing pattern of similar failures, Agency was ordered to provide an analysis of its Fiscal Year 2018-2019 reporting on compliance with EEOC orders and a detailed action plan setting forth how the problems identified in its analysis will be corrected. Lauralee C. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. The U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120123216 (Jan. 8, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120123216.txt. v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, EEOC Case No. The USPS increased its productivity each year from 20002007 mainly through automation, route optimization and through facility consolidation. info@eeoc.gov The DFEC Web site provides very useful information regarding the claims process. Kylee C. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers: 2020001154 (Apr. Costs USPS agreed to pay $840,044 for 4,584 pre-complaint settlements, of which 433 were monetary settlements averaging $1,940. 0120180519 (Mar. Bart M. v. Dep't of the Interior, EEOC Appeal No. 24, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120132211.txt. Pay differential was based on a factor other than sex where male comparator was hired one year after complainants were hired, a different management official evaluated his application under different circumstances, and the different grade classifications were due to a difference in professional judgment by the evaluating officials. First, please know that we will continue fighting to get you the best possible award. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY) The Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider appeals from Peace Corps volunteers and applicants, who have a separate EEO complaint process outside Commission jurisdiction; although Complainant filed her complaint against the State Department, it concerned a Peace Corps volunteer position over which the Commission did not have jurisdiction. Case remanded to Agency for further investigation of Complainant's harassment claims where record was devoid of any evidence that Complainant's co-workers, including the alleged harasser, were interviewed during the investigation. Cox claims upon returning to work she was subjected to a continuing and ongoing hostile work environment by Supervisor Freeman and Postmaster McQuiston. 0120170218 (Dec. 21, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170218.txt. USPS Settlement An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. 2019005682 (Apr. 1 min read. Many noteworthy federal appellate decisions are frequently used as a part of the Commission's outreach and training efforts. Ashlee P. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone), Call 1-800-669-4000 0120090062 (9/21/10). I wish i could say that this the full loss to the workers, 0120171750 (Feb. 28, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171750.pdf. Mae P. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC Appeal No. 0120180568 (Apr. endstream endobj startxref 0120162182 (Dec. 8, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162182.txt. Find your nearest EEOC office What Hasn't Been Working Well Imagine the EEOC ruling against you in a discrimination charge and inviting you to a settlement conference without explaining either why you lost the case or how [] 2019005929 (June 15, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2019005929.pdf. Share sensitive According to the Agency Financial Report for FY 2020, the EEOC successfully resolved 6,272 of the 9,036 mediations conducted. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 2019001284 (Aug. 4, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019001284.pdf. We keep track of our clients contact information, and we can provide that to USPS or the EEOC Administrative Judge when they need it. 2020002203, 2020002190, 2020002216, 2020002197 (Jan. 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_16/2020002203.pdf. The MVS Craft continues to grow. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Francine M. v. U.S. According to the US Labor Department, postal workers accounted for only one-fifth of all federal employees in 2019, yet were disproportionately injured on the job, experiencing half of all workplace illness and injuries among federal employees. Complainant subjected to a hostile work environment based on sex where subordinate disparaged him because of his sexual orientation and managers, who placed the onus on Complainant to discipline the harasser or file an EEO complaint, failed to take prompt and effective action; because Agency did not have an effective anti-harassment policy, Agency was ordered to seek technical assistance from EEOC's Office of Federal Operations and to correct the policy's deficiencies. We have presented the Judge with many options on ways to quickly move the relief process forward, and we continue to do everything we can to help get relief into your hands. Edward W. v. Social Security Admin., EEOC Appeal No. n In the left-hand column under "Essential Links," click . usps eeoc settlements 2020aiken county sc register of deeds usps eeoc settlements 2020 In total, the EEOC received 46,158 Title VII charges in 2020 and was able to reach a settlement on 7.3% or 3,603 of those charges.